FSH vs PKP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and PKP (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FSH | PKP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.93% | 0.09% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | −1.87% | 0.65% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | −1.63% | 2.93% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 4.16% | 9.83% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 19.57% | 21.10% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 34.85% | 33.59% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 37.95% | — | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 260.48% | — | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FSH vs PKP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and PKP (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FSH leads in 3 and PKP leads in 6. FSH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FSH leads (0.93% vs 0.09%). 1 week: PKP leads (0.65% vs −1.87%). 1 month: PKP leads (2.93% vs −1.63%). 3 months: PKP leads (9.83% vs 4.16%). 6 months: PKP leads (21.10% vs 19.57%). YTD: FSH leads (34.85% vs 33.59%). Size (TRY): PKP leads (348.6M vs 348.2M). Investors: FSH leads (444 vs 58). Risk: PKP leads (1 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FSH or PKP?
Year to date FSH returned 34.85% and PKP returned 33.59%; over the last year FSH returned 37.95% and PKP returned —. Over the last month FSH returned −1.63% and PKP returned 2.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FSH or PKP?
As of October 22, 2026, FSH has a size of TRY 348.2M with 444 investors, while PKP has a size of TRY 348.6M with 58 investors. PKP leads in size and FSH leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FSH and PKP mean?
The CMB risk score of FSH is 6 out of 7 and that of PKP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.