Yatırımcı.AI

FSH vs IMF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) side by side.

FSHIMF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FSH vs IMF Fund Comparison
MetricFSHIMFCategory median
Daily−0.63%−1.35%−0.07%
1 week0.53%−2.75%−0.29%
1 month1.86%−2.86%0.00%
3 months6.32%2.87%4.33%
6 months45.69%9.08%11.90%
YTD37.82%8.06%14.97%
1 year47.52%22.59%21.27%
3 years269.65%95.84%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FSH vs IMF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FSH leads in 9 and IMF leads in 2. FSH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IMF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FSH leads (−0.63% vs −1.35%). 1 week: FSH leads (0.53% vs −2.75%). 1 month: FSH leads (1.86% vs −2.86%). 3 months: FSH leads (6.32% vs 2.87%). 6 months: FSH leads (45.69% vs 9.08%). YTD: FSH leads (37.82% vs 8.06%). 1 year: FSH leads (47.52% vs 22.59%). 3 years: FSH leads (269.65% vs 95.84%). Size (TRY): IMF leads (373.6M vs 369.9M). Investors: FSH leads (479 vs 19). Risk: IMF leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FSH returned 37.82% and IMF returned 8.06%; over the last year FSH returned 47.52% and IMF returned 22.59%. Over the last month FSH returned 1.86% and IMF returned −2.86%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, FSH has a size of TRY 369.9M with 479 investors, while IMF has a size of TRY 373.6M with 19 investors. IMF leads in size and FSH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSH is 6 out of 7 and that of IMF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.