Yatırımcı.AI

FLS vs GKH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and GKH (Garanti Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

FLSGKH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FLS vs GKH Fund Comparison
MetricFLSGKHCategory median
Daily−0.34%0.15%−0.07%
1 week−1.26%0.69%−0.29%
1 month−1.91%3.23%0.00%
3 months4.58%9.83%4.33%
6 months17.27%21.02%11.90%
YTD12.54%31.91%14.97%
1 year21.33%45.01%21.27%
3 years—240.43%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FLS vs GKH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and GKH (Garanti Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FLS leads in 2 and GKH leads in 7. FLS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GKH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GKH leads (0.15% vs −0.34%). 1 week: GKH leads (0.69% vs −1.26%). 1 month: GKH leads (3.23% vs −1.91%). 3 months: GKH leads (9.83% vs 4.58%). 6 months: GKH leads (21.02% vs 17.27%). YTD: GKH leads (31.91% vs 12.54%). 1 year: GKH leads (45.01% vs 21.33%). Size (TRY): FLS leads (4B vs 3.9B). Investors: FLS leads (2,157 vs 1,904).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FLS returned 12.54% and GKH returned 31.91%; over the last year FLS returned 21.33% and GKH returned 45.01%. Over the last month FLS returned −1.91% and GKH returned 3.23%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, FLS has a size of TRY 4B with 2,157 investors, while GKH has a size of TRY 3.9B with 1,904 investors. FLS leads in size and FLS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FLS is — out of 7 and that of GKH is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.