DVS vs FLS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DVS | FLS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | −0.34% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.69% | −1.26% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | 3.17% | −1.91% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 10.04% | 4.58% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 21.00% | 17.27% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 32.13% | 12.54% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 45.80% | 21.33% | 21.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DVS vs FLS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DVS leads in 8 and FLS leads in 1. DVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FLS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DVS leads (0.10% vs −0.34%). 1 week: DVS leads (0.69% vs −1.26%). 1 month: DVS leads (3.17% vs −1.91%). 3 months: DVS leads (10.04% vs 4.58%). 6 months: DVS leads (21.00% vs 17.27%). YTD: DVS leads (32.13% vs 12.54%). 1 year: DVS leads (45.80% vs 21.33%). Size (TRY): DVS leads (4.1B vs 4B). Investors: FLS leads (2,157 vs 354).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DVS or FLS?
Year to date DVS returned 32.13% and FLS returned 12.54%; over the last year DVS returned 45.80% and FLS returned 21.33%. Over the last month DVS returned 3.17% and FLS returned −1.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DVS or FLS?
As of September 29, 2026, DVS has a size of TRY 4.1B with 354 investors, while FLS has a size of TRY 4B with 2,157 investors. DVS leads in size and FLS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DVS and FLS mean?
The CMB risk score of DVS is 2 out of 7 and that of FLS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.