FLS vs HTF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and HTF (HSBC Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FLS | HTF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.51% | 0.09% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | −0.78% | 0.66% | 0.51% |
| 1 month | 0.99% | 3.01% | 1.66% |
| 3 months | 0.51% | 9.42% | 3.04% |
| 6 months | 6.14% | 20.69% | 8.17% |
| YTD | 13.60% | 38.27% | 17.49% |
| 1 year | 18.86% | 45.25% | 21.23% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FLS vs HTF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and HTF (HSBC Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FLS leads in 2 and HTF leads in 7. FLS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HTF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by HSBC Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: HTF leads (0.09% vs −0.51%). 1 week: HTF leads (0.66% vs −0.78%). 1 month: HTF leads (3.01% vs 0.99%). 3 months: HTF leads (9.42% vs 0.51%). 6 months: HTF leads (20.69% vs 6.14%). YTD: HTF leads (38.27% vs 13.60%). 1 year: HTF leads (45.25% vs 18.86%). Size (TRY): FLS leads (3.8B vs 3.7B). Investors: FLS leads (1,968 vs 437).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FLS or HTF?
Year to date FLS returned 13.60% and HTF returned 38.27%; over the last year FLS returned 18.86% and HTF returned 45.25%. Over the last month FLS returned 0.99% and HTF returned 3.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FLS or HTF?
As of November 13, 2026, FLS has a size of TRY 3.8B with 1,968 investors, while HTF has a size of TRY 3.7B with 437 investors. FLS leads in size and FLS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FLS and HTF mean?
The CMB risk score of FLS is — out of 7 and that of HTF is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.