Yatırımcı.AI

FIL vs IOO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and IOO (İş Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

FILIOO
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FIL vs IOO Fund Comparison
MetricFILIOOCategory median
Daily0.29%0.30%0.29%
1 week0.69%0.69%0.70%
1 month3.08%3.12%3.12%
3 months9.88%10.05%9.98%
6 months21.44%21.53%21.60%
YTD32.08%31.87%32.28%
1 year46.18%45.89%46.56%
3 years258.62%258.98%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FIL vs IOO comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and IOO (İş Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIL leads in 5 and IOO leads in 6. FIL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IOO is a Money Market Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IOO leads (0.30% vs 0.29%). 1 week: FIL leads (0.69% vs 0.69%). 1 month: IOO leads (3.12% vs 3.08%). 3 months: IOO leads (10.05% vs 9.88%). 6 months: IOO leads (21.53% vs 21.44%). YTD: FIL leads (32.08% vs 31.87%). 1 year: FIL leads (46.18% vs 45.89%). 3 years: IOO leads (258.98% vs 258.62%). Size (TRY): IOO leads (29B vs 15.3B). Investors: FIL leads (20,525 vs 10,404). Risk: FIL leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FIL returned 32.08% and IOO returned 31.87%; over the last year FIL returned 46.18% and IOO returned 45.89%. Over the last month FIL returned 3.08% and IOO returned 3.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FIL has a size of TRY 15.3B with 20,525 investors, while IOO has a size of TRY 29B with 10,404 investors. IOO leads in size and FIL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIL is 1 out of 7 and that of IOO is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.