Yatırımcı.AI

FIL vs PPZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPZ (Azimut Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

FILPPZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FIL vs PPZ Fund Comparison
MetricFILPPZCategory median
Daily0.29%0.12%0.29%
1 week0.69%0.52%0.70%
1 month3.08%2.92%3.12%
3 months9.88%9.74%9.98%
6 months21.44%21.40%21.60%
YTD32.08%31.96%32.28%
1 year46.18%45.91%46.56%
3 years258.62%260.77%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FIL vs PPZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPZ (Azimut Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIL leads in 10 and PPZ leads in 1. FIL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPZ is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FIL leads (0.29% vs 0.12%). 1 week: FIL leads (0.69% vs 0.52%). 1 month: FIL leads (3.08% vs 2.92%). 3 months: FIL leads (9.88% vs 9.74%). 6 months: FIL leads (21.44% vs 21.40%). YTD: FIL leads (32.08% vs 31.96%). 1 year: FIL leads (46.18% vs 45.91%). 3 years: PPZ leads (260.77% vs 258.62%). Size (TRY): FIL leads (15.3B vs 10.3B). Investors: FIL leads (20,525 vs 7,555). Risk: FIL leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FIL returned 32.08% and PPZ returned 31.96%; over the last year FIL returned 46.18% and PPZ returned 45.91%. Over the last month FIL returned 3.08% and PPZ returned 2.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FIL has a size of TRY 15.3B with 20,525 investors, while PPZ has a size of TRY 10.3B with 7,555 investors. FIL leads in size and FIL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIL is 1 out of 7 and that of PPZ is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.