Yatırımcı.AI

IOO vs PPZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IOO (İş Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPZ (Azimut Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

IOOPPZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IOO vs PPZ Fund Comparison
MetricIOOPPZCategory median
Daily0.11%0.09%0.10%
1 week0.71%0.65%0.67%
1 month3.10%3.03%2.99%
3 months9.80%9.40%9.43%
6 months20.80%20.69%20.54%
YTD38.10%38.17%37.92%
1 year45.26%45.32%45.19%
3 years259.26%259.88%254.03%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IOO vs PPZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IOO (İş Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPZ (Azimut Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IOO leads in 7 and PPZ leads in 3. IOO is a Money Market Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPZ is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IOO leads (0.11% vs 0.09%). 1 week: IOO leads (0.71% vs 0.65%). 1 month: IOO leads (3.10% vs 3.03%). 3 months: IOO leads (9.80% vs 9.40%). 6 months: IOO leads (20.80% vs 20.69%). YTD: PPZ leads (38.17% vs 38.10%). 1 year: PPZ leads (45.32% vs 45.26%). 3 years: PPZ leads (259.88% vs 259.26%). Size (TRY): IOO leads (33B vs 10.1B). Investors: IOO leads (12,411 vs 7,116).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IOO returned 38.10% and PPZ returned 38.17%; over the last year IOO returned 45.26% and PPZ returned 45.32%. Over the last month IOO returned 3.10% and PPZ returned 3.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, IOO has a size of TRY 33B with 12,411 investors, while PPZ has a size of TRY 10.1B with 7,116 investors. IOO leads in size and IOO leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IOO is 2 out of 7 and that of PPZ is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.