FIL vs PPN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPN (Nurol Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FIL | PPN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | −0.05% | 0.10% |
| 1 week | 0.68% | 0.57% | 0.67% |
| 1 month | 2.99% | 2.92% | 2.99% |
| 3 months | 9.47% | 9.58% | 9.43% |
| 6 months | 20.71% | 21.19% | 20.54% |
| YTD | 38.20% | 39.23% | 37.92% |
| 1 year | 45.35% | 46.66% | 45.19% |
| 3 years | 258.23% | 269.50% | 254.03% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FIL vs PPN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPN (Nurol Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FIL leads in 5 and PPN leads in 5. FIL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPN is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FIL leads (0.10% vs −0.05%). 1 week: FIL leads (0.68% vs 0.57%). 1 month: FIL leads (2.99% vs 2.92%). 3 months: PPN leads (9.58% vs 9.47%). 6 months: PPN leads (21.19% vs 20.71%). YTD: PPN leads (39.23% vs 38.20%). 1 year: PPN leads (46.66% vs 45.35%). 3 years: PPN leads (269.50% vs 258.23%). Size (TRY): FIL leads (15.2B vs 7.5B). Investors: FIL leads (20,565 vs 10,014).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FIL or PPN?
Year to date FIL returned 38.20% and PPN returned 39.23%; over the last year FIL returned 45.35% and PPN returned 46.66%. Over the last month FIL returned 2.99% and PPN returned 2.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FIL or PPN?
As of November 12, 2026, FIL has a size of TRY 15.2B with 20,565 investors, while PPN has a size of TRY 7.5B with 10,014 investors. FIL leads in size and FIL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FIL and PPN mean?
The CMB risk score of FIL is 1 out of 7 and that of PPN is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.