Yatırımcı.AI

DL2 vs FIL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DL2 (Deniz Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

DL2FIL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DL2 vs FIL Fund Comparison
MetricDL2FILCategory median
Daily0.09%0.09%0.09%
1 week0.70%0.68%0.69%
1 month3.03%2.96%2.97%
3 months9.80%9.75%9.76%
6 months20.89%20.91%20.90%
YTD35.56%35.59%35.49%
1 year45.86%45.76%45.62%
3 years32.55%258.79%255.49%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DL2 vs FIL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DL2 (Deniz Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DL2 leads in 4 and FIL leads in 6. DL2 is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FIL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FIL leads (0.09% vs 0.09%). 1 week: DL2 leads (0.70% vs 0.68%). 1 month: DL2 leads (3.03% vs 2.96%). 3 months: DL2 leads (9.80% vs 9.75%). 6 months: FIL leads (20.91% vs 20.89%). YTD: FIL leads (35.59% vs 35.56%). 1 year: DL2 leads (45.86% vs 45.76%). 3 years: FIL leads (258.79% vs 32.55%). Size (TRY): FIL leads (14.7B vs 6.2B). Investors: FIL leads (19,879 vs 596).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DL2 returned 35.56% and FIL returned 35.59%; over the last year DL2 returned 45.86% and FIL returned 45.76%. Over the last month DL2 returned 3.03% and FIL returned 2.96%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, DL2 has a size of TRY 6.2B with 596 investors, while FIL has a size of TRY 14.7B with 19,879 investors. FIL leads in size and FIL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DL2 is 1 out of 7 and that of FIL is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.