FGF vs MHZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FGF (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FGF | MHZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.07% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
| 1 week | 0.29% | 0.36% | 0.43% |
| 1 month | 1.03% | 0.54% | 0.58% |
| 3 months | 6.35% | 4.88% | 5.61% |
| 6 months | 15.54% | 13.99% | 15.62% |
| YTD | 19.92% | 15.95% | 20.05% |
| 1 year | 29.53% | 27.67% | 32.76% |
| 3 years | 132.91% | 133.75% | 143.95% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FGF vs MHZ comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FGF (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FGF leads in 8 and MHZ leads in 3. FGF is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MHZ is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MHZ leads (0.26% vs 0.07%). 1 week: MHZ leads (0.36% vs 0.29%). 1 month: FGF leads (1.03% vs 0.54%). 3 months: FGF leads (6.35% vs 4.88%). 6 months: FGF leads (15.54% vs 13.99%). YTD: FGF leads (19.92% vs 15.95%). 1 year: FGF leads (29.53% vs 27.67%). 3 years: MHZ leads (133.75% vs 132.91%). Size (TRY): FGF leads (1.2B vs 718.3M). Investors: FGF leads (189,182 vs 127,917). Risk: FGF leads (3 vs 4).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FGF or MHZ?
Year to date FGF returned 19.92% and MHZ returned 15.95%; over the last year FGF returned 29.53% and MHZ returned 27.67%. Over the last month FGF returned 1.03% and MHZ returned 0.54%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FGF or MHZ?
As of September 28, 2026, FGF has a size of TRY 1.2B with 189,182 investors, while MHZ has a size of TRY 718.3M with 127,917 investors. FGF leads in size and FGF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FGF and MHZ mean?
The CMB risk score of FGF is 3 out of 7 and that of MHZ is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.