FGF vs MHZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FGF (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FGF | MHZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.09% | −0.06% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.95% | 1.00% | 1.07% |
| 1 month | 0.85% | 0.30% | 1.30% |
| 3 months | 5.17% | 4.38% | 5.72% |
| 6 months | 10.39% | 7.72% | 9.51% |
| YTD | 21.94% | 17.14% | 22.13% |
| 1 year | 29.47% | 26.37% | 32.08% |
| 3 years | 135.03% | 135.11% | 148.01% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FGF vs MHZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FGF (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FGF leads in 8 and MHZ leads in 3. FGF is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MHZ is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MHZ leads (−0.06% vs −0.09%). 1 week: MHZ leads (1.00% vs 0.95%). 1 month: FGF leads (0.85% vs 0.30%). 3 months: FGF leads (5.17% vs 4.38%). 6 months: FGF leads (10.39% vs 7.72%). YTD: FGF leads (21.94% vs 17.14%). 1 year: FGF leads (29.47% vs 26.37%). 3 years: MHZ leads (135.11% vs 135.03%). Size (TRY): FGF leads (1.2B vs 734.6M). Investors: FGF leads (190,113 vs 128,907). Risk: FGF leads (3 vs 4).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FGF or MHZ?
Year to date FGF returned 21.94% and MHZ returned 17.14%; over the last year FGF returned 29.47% and MHZ returned 26.37%. Over the last month FGF returned 0.85% and MHZ returned 0.30%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FGF or MHZ?
As of November 12, 2026, FGF has a size of TRY 1.2B with 190,113 investors, while MHZ has a size of TRY 734.6M with 128,907 investors. FGF leads in size and FGF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FGF and MHZ mean?
The CMB risk score of FGF is 3 out of 7 and that of MHZ is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.