BNL vs FGF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BNL (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FGF (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BNL | FGF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.22% | 0.07% | 0.26% |
| 1 week | 0.50% | 0.29% | 0.43% |
| 1 month | −0.11% | 1.03% | 0.58% |
| 3 months | 4.50% | 6.35% | 5.61% |
| 6 months | 14.39% | 15.54% | 15.62% |
| YTD | 18.71% | 19.92% | 20.05% |
| 1 year | 29.03% | 29.53% | 32.76% |
| 3 years | 138.02% | 132.91% | 143.95% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BNL vs FGF comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BNL (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and FGF (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BNL leads in 3 and FGF leads in 8. BNL is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Bnp Parıbas Cardıf Emeklilik A.Ş.; FGF is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BNL leads (0.22% vs 0.07%). 1 week: BNL leads (0.50% vs 0.29%). 1 month: FGF leads (1.03% vs −0.11%). 3 months: FGF leads (6.35% vs 4.50%). 6 months: FGF leads (15.54% vs 14.39%). YTD: FGF leads (19.92% vs 18.71%). 1 year: FGF leads (29.53% vs 29.03%). 3 years: BNL leads (138.02% vs 132.91%). Size (TRY): FGF leads (1.2B vs 983M). Investors: FGF leads (189,182 vs 150,007). Risk: FGF leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, BNL or FGF?
Year to date BNL returned 18.71% and FGF returned 19.92%; over the last year BNL returned 29.03% and FGF returned 29.53%. Over the last month BNL returned −0.11% and FGF returned 1.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BNL or FGF?
As of September 28, 2026, BNL has a size of TRY 983M with 150,007 investors, while FGF has a size of TRY 1.2B with 189,182 investors. FGF leads in size and FGF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BNL and FGF mean?
The CMB risk score of BNL is 5 out of 7 and that of FGF is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.