CHU vs MHZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHU (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | CHU | MHZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.27% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
| 1 week | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.43% |
| 1 month | 0.12% | 0.54% | 0.58% |
| 3 months | 6.71% | 4.88% | 5.61% |
| 6 months | 15.80% | 13.99% | 15.62% |
| YTD | 21.87% | 15.95% | 20.05% |
| 1 year | 33.59% | 27.67% | 32.76% |
| 3 years | 139.61% | 133.75% | 143.95% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the CHU vs MHZ comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CHU (Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CHU leads in 6 and MHZ leads in 4. CHU is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Qnb Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHZ is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: CHU leads (0.27% vs 0.26%). 1 week: MHZ leads (0.36% vs 0.34%). 1 month: MHZ leads (0.54% vs 0.12%). 3 months: CHU leads (6.71% vs 4.88%). 6 months: CHU leads (15.80% vs 13.99%). YTD: CHU leads (21.87% vs 15.95%). 1 year: CHU leads (33.59% vs 27.67%). 3 years: CHU leads (139.61% vs 133.75%). Size (TRY): MHZ leads (718.3M vs 412.2M). Investors: MHZ leads (127,917 vs 66,125).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, CHU or MHZ?
Year to date CHU returned 21.87% and MHZ returned 15.95%; over the last year CHU returned 33.59% and MHZ returned 27.67%. Over the last month CHU returned 0.12% and MHZ returned 0.54%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CHU or MHZ?
As of September 28, 2026, CHU has a size of TRY 412.2M with 66,125 investors, while MHZ has a size of TRY 718.3M with 127,917 investors. MHZ leads in size and MHZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CHU and MHZ mean?
The CMB risk score of CHU is 4 out of 7 and that of MHZ is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.