BNL vs MHZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BNL (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BNL | MHZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.22% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
| 1 week | 0.50% | 0.36% | 0.43% |
| 1 month | −0.11% | 0.54% | 0.58% |
| 3 months | 4.50% | 4.88% | 5.61% |
| 6 months | 14.39% | 13.99% | 15.62% |
| YTD | 18.71% | 15.95% | 20.05% |
| 1 year | 29.03% | 27.67% | 32.76% |
| 3 years | 138.02% | 133.75% | 143.95% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BNL vs MHZ comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BNL (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BNL leads in 7 and MHZ leads in 4. BNL is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Bnp Parıbas Cardıf Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHZ is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MHZ leads (0.26% vs 0.22%). 1 week: BNL leads (0.50% vs 0.36%). 1 month: MHZ leads (0.54% vs −0.11%). 3 months: MHZ leads (4.88% vs 4.50%). 6 months: BNL leads (14.39% vs 13.99%). YTD: BNL leads (18.71% vs 15.95%). 1 year: BNL leads (29.03% vs 27.67%). 3 years: BNL leads (138.02% vs 133.75%). Size (TRY): BNL leads (983M vs 718.3M). Investors: BNL leads (150,007 vs 127,917). Risk: MHZ leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, BNL or MHZ?
Year to date BNL returned 18.71% and MHZ returned 15.95%; over the last year BNL returned 29.03% and MHZ returned 27.67%. Over the last month BNL returned −0.11% and MHZ returned 0.54%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BNL or MHZ?
As of September 28, 2026, BNL has a size of TRY 983M with 150,007 investors, while MHZ has a size of TRY 718.3M with 127,917 investors. BNL leads in size and BNL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BNL and MHZ mean?
The CMB risk score of BNL is 5 out of 7 and that of MHZ is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.