HEC vs MHZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HEC (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | HEC | MHZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.07% | −0.06% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 1.06% | 1.00% | 1.07% |
| 1 month | 1.37% | 0.30% | 1.30% |
| 3 months | 6.11% | 4.38% | 5.72% |
| 6 months | 9.33% | 7.72% | 9.51% |
| YTD | 23.10% | 17.14% | 22.13% |
| 1 year | 33.03% | 26.37% | 32.08% |
| 3 years | 165.36% | 135.11% | 148.01% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the HEC vs MHZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of HEC (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHZ (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, HEC leads in 8 and MHZ leads in 2. HEC is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MHZ is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: HEC leads (0.07% vs −0.06%). 1 week: HEC leads (1.06% vs 1.00%). 1 month: HEC leads (1.37% vs 0.30%). 3 months: HEC leads (6.11% vs 4.38%). 6 months: HEC leads (9.33% vs 7.72%). YTD: HEC leads (23.10% vs 17.14%). 1 year: HEC leads (33.03% vs 26.37%). 3 years: HEC leads (165.36% vs 135.11%). Size (TRY): MHZ leads (734.6M vs 532.5M). Investors: MHZ leads (128,907 vs 71,386).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, HEC or MHZ?
Year to date HEC returned 23.10% and MHZ returned 17.14%; over the last year HEC returned 33.03% and MHZ returned 26.37%. Over the last month HEC returned 1.37% and MHZ returned 0.30%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, HEC or MHZ?
As of November 12, 2026, HEC has a size of TRY 532.5M with 71,386 investors, while MHZ has a size of TRY 734.6M with 128,907 investors. MHZ leads in size and MHZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of HEC and MHZ mean?
The CMB risk score of HEC is 4 out of 7 and that of MHZ is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.