Yatırımcı.AI

FBZ vs GRL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) and GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) side by side.

FBZGRL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBZ vs GRL Fund Comparison
MetricFBZGRLCategory median
Daily−1.17%0.81%0.01%
1 week−1.10%−0.47%0.30%
1 month−3.79%−4.36%0.00%
3 months5.73%1.00%3.96%
6 months15.68%0.65%8.18%
YTD27.83%16.09%15.73%
1 year31.45%26.80%20.69%
3 years184.66%17.37%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBZ vs GRL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) and GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FBZ leads in 8 and GRL leads in 3. FBZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GRL leads (0.81% vs −1.17%). 1 week: GRL leads (−0.47% vs −1.10%). 1 month: FBZ leads (−3.79% vs −4.36%). 3 months: FBZ leads (5.73% vs 1.00%). 6 months: FBZ leads (15.68% vs 0.65%). YTD: FBZ leads (27.83% vs 16.09%). 1 year: FBZ leads (31.45% vs 26.80%). 3 years: FBZ leads (184.66% vs 17.37%). Size (TRY): FBZ leads (238.7M vs 134.1M). Investors: FBZ leads (337 vs 234). Risk: GRL leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBZ returned 27.83% and GRL returned 16.09%; over the last year FBZ returned 31.45% and GRL returned 26.80%. Over the last month FBZ returned −3.79% and GRL returned −4.36%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, FBZ has a size of TRY 238.7M with 337 investors, while GRL has a size of TRY 134.1M with 234 investors. FBZ leads in size and FBZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBZ is 6 out of 7 and that of GRL is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.