Yatırımcı.AI

GRL vs NKA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

GRLNKA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GRL vs NKA Fund Comparison
MetricGRLNKACategory median
Daily0.09%0.05%0.05%
1 week−1.78%0.47%0.44%
1 month−4.47%1.85%0.38%
3 months0.15%5.72%3.95%
6 months−0.16%11.76%8.45%
YTD15.15%17.82%16.06%
1 year25.99%21.04%20.98%
3 years17.37%—107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GRL vs NKA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GRL leads in 3 and NKA leads in 7. GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NKA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GRL leads (0.09% vs 0.05%). 1 week: NKA leads (0.47% vs −1.78%). 1 month: NKA leads (1.85% vs −4.47%). 3 months: NKA leads (5.72% vs 0.15%). 6 months: NKA leads (11.76% vs −0.16%). YTD: NKA leads (17.82% vs 15.15%). 1 year: GRL leads (25.99% vs 21.04%). Size (TRY): NKA leads (133.5M vs 133M). Investors: GRL leads (236 vs 8). Risk: NKA leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GRL returned 15.15% and NKA returned 17.82%; over the last year GRL returned 25.99% and NKA returned 21.04%. Over the last month GRL returned −4.47% and NKA returned 1.85%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GRL has a size of TRY 133M with 236 investors, while NKA has a size of TRY 133.5M with 8 investors. NKA leads in size and GRL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GRL is 5 out of 7 and that of NKA is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.