Yatırımcı.AI

ANZ vs FBZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ANZ (Ata Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) side by side.

ANZFBZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ANZ vs FBZ Fund Comparison
MetricANZFBZCategory median
Daily−0.08%0.48%0.05%
1 week0.58%−1.94%0.44%
1 month0.46%−1.06%0.38%
3 months2.80%7.04%3.95%
6 months7.94%17.05%8.45%
YTD14.25%29.35%16.06%
1 year19.97%32.71%20.98%
3 years107.91%188.03%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ANZ vs FBZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ANZ (Ata Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ANZ leads in 2 and FBZ leads in 8. ANZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FBZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FBZ leads (0.48% vs −0.08%). 1 week: ANZ leads (0.58% vs −1.94%). 1 month: ANZ leads (0.46% vs −1.06%). 3 months: FBZ leads (7.04% vs 2.80%). 6 months: FBZ leads (17.05% vs 7.94%). YTD: FBZ leads (29.35% vs 14.25%). 1 year: FBZ leads (32.71% vs 19.97%). 3 years: FBZ leads (188.03% vs 107.91%). Size (TRY): FBZ leads (241.5M vs 230.3M). Investors: FBZ leads (341 vs 120).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ANZ returned 14.25% and FBZ returned 29.35%; over the last year ANZ returned 19.97% and FBZ returned 32.71%. Over the last month ANZ returned 0.46% and FBZ returned −1.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, ANZ has a size of TRY 230.3M with 120 investors, while FBZ has a size of TRY 241.5M with 341 investors. FBZ leads in size and FBZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ANZ is — out of 7 and that of FBZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.