Yatırımcı.AI

FBZ vs TTL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) and TTL (Tacirler Portföy Kartopu Serbest Fon) side by side.

FBZTTL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBZ vs TTL Fund Comparison
MetricFBZTTLCategory median
Today (est.)—−2.81%−2.31%
Daily1.06%0.42%0.19%
1 week2.27%−0.24%0.42%
1 month1.93%−2.70%0.94%
3 months9.34%0.01%5.89%
6 months37.69%17.12%12.86%
YTD32.86%26.92%18.07%
1 year43.53%32.28%24.44%
3 years199.64%314.20%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 14:11.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBZ vs TTL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) and TTL (Tacirler Portföy Kartopu Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FBZ leads in 9 and TTL leads in 2. FBZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TTL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Tacirler Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FBZ leads (1.06% vs 0.42%). 1 week: FBZ leads (2.27% vs −0.24%). 1 month: FBZ leads (1.93% vs −2.70%). 3 months: FBZ leads (9.34% vs 0.01%). 6 months: FBZ leads (37.69% vs 17.12%). YTD: FBZ leads (32.86% vs 26.92%). 1 year: FBZ leads (43.53% vs 32.28%). 3 years: TTL leads (314.20% vs 199.64%). Size (TRY): TTL leads (291.3M vs 282.9M). Investors: FBZ leads (370 vs 294). Risk: FBZ leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBZ returned 32.86% and TTL returned 26.92%; over the last year FBZ returned 43.53% and TTL returned 32.28%. Over the last month FBZ returned 1.93% and TTL returned −2.70%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FBZ has a size of TRY 282.9M with 370 investors, while TTL has a size of TRY 291.3M with 294 investors. TTL leads in size and FBZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBZ is 6 out of 7 and that of TTL is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.