Yatırımcı.AI

DFD vs GRL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DFD (Deniz Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) side by side.

DFDGRL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DFD vs GRL Fund Comparison
MetricDFDGRLCategory median
Daily−0.28%0.09%0.05%
1 week−1.08%−1.78%0.44%
1 month−3.50%−4.47%0.38%
3 months4.73%0.15%3.95%
6 months4.64%−0.16%8.45%
YTD20.84%15.15%16.06%
1 year29.09%25.99%20.98%
3 years101.65%17.37%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DFD vs GRL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DFD (Deniz Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and GRL (QNB Portföy Agresif Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, DFD leads in 8 and GRL leads in 3. DFD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GRL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GRL leads (0.09% vs −0.28%). 1 week: DFD leads (−1.08% vs −1.78%). 1 month: DFD leads (−3.50% vs −4.47%). 3 months: DFD leads (4.73% vs 0.15%). 6 months: DFD leads (4.64% vs −0.16%). YTD: DFD leads (20.84% vs 15.15%). 1 year: DFD leads (29.09% vs 25.99%). 3 years: DFD leads (101.65% vs 17.37%). Size (TRY): GRL leads (133M vs 132.8M). Investors: DFD leads (383 vs 236). Risk: GRL leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DFD returned 20.84% and GRL returned 15.15%; over the last year DFD returned 29.09% and GRL returned 25.99%. Over the last month DFD returned −3.50% and GRL returned −4.47%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, DFD has a size of TRY 132.8M with 383 investors, while GRL has a size of TRY 133M with 236 investors. GRL leads in size and DFD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DFD is 6 out of 7 and that of GRL is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.