ESP vs MLT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ESP (Aura Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and MLT (Deniz Portföy Meltem Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ESP | MLT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −1.23% | −0.74% |
| Daily | −9.11% | −1.23% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −7.55% | −0.59% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −33.16% | −2.26% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −38.94% | −0.27% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | −30.64% | 11.57% | 11.90% |
| YTD | −68.40% | 24.98% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | −76.37% | 25.27% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | −76.11% | — | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ESP vs MLT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ESP (Aura Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and MLT (Deniz Portföy Meltem Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ESP leads in 1 and MLT leads in 9. ESP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aura Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MLT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MLT leads (−1.23% vs −9.11%). 1 week: MLT leads (−0.59% vs −7.55%). 1 month: MLT leads (−2.26% vs −33.16%). 3 months: MLT leads (−0.27% vs −38.94%). 6 months: MLT leads (11.57% vs −30.64%). YTD: MLT leads (24.98% vs −68.40%). 1 year: MLT leads (25.27% vs −76.37%). Size (TRY): MLT leads (19.8M vs 18.1M). Investors: ESP leads (241 vs 66). Risk: MLT leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ESP or MLT?
Year to date ESP returned −68.40% and MLT returned 24.98%; over the last year ESP returned −76.37% and MLT returned 25.27%. Over the last month ESP returned −33.16% and MLT returned −2.26%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ESP or MLT?
As of September 29, 2026, ESP has a size of TRY 18.1M with 241 investors, while MLT has a size of TRY 19.8M with 66 investors. MLT leads in size and ESP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ESP and MLT mean?
The CMB risk score of ESP is 7 out of 7 and that of MLT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.