Yatırımcı.AI

ESP vs OLA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ESP (Aura Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and OLA (Osmanlı Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz- Avro) Fon) side by side.

ESPOLA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ESP vs OLA Fund Comparison
MetricESPOLACategory median
Daily−9.11%0.07%−0.07%
1 week−7.55%−0.42%−0.29%
1 month−33.16%−0.81%0.00%
3 months−38.94%4.27%4.33%
6 months−30.64%7.20%11.90%
YTD−68.40%7.54%14.97%
1 year−76.37%11.98%21.27%
3 years−76.11%100.34%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ESP vs OLA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ESP (Aura Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and OLA (Osmanlı Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz- Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ESP leads in 1 and OLA leads in 9. ESP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aura Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OLA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OLA leads (0.07% vs −9.11%). 1 week: OLA leads (−0.42% vs −7.55%). 1 month: OLA leads (−0.81% vs −33.16%). 3 months: OLA leads (4.27% vs −38.94%). 6 months: OLA leads (7.20% vs −30.64%). YTD: OLA leads (7.54% vs −68.40%). 1 year: OLA leads (11.98% vs −76.37%). 3 years: OLA leads (100.34% vs −76.11%). Size (TRY): OLA leads (19.1M vs 18.1M). Investors: ESP leads (241 vs 26).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ESP returned −68.40% and OLA returned 7.54%; over the last year ESP returned −76.37% and OLA returned 11.98%. Over the last month ESP returned −33.16% and OLA returned −0.81%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, ESP has a size of TRY 18.1M with 241 investors, while OLA has a size of TRY 19.1M with 26 investors. OLA leads in size and ESP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ESP is 7 out of 7 and that of OLA is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.