GLG vs MLT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GLG (Aktif Portföy Capital Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and MLT (Deniz Portföy Meltem Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLG | MLT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −2.41% | −1.49% | −0.81% |
| Daily | −1.87% | −1.23% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −2.76% | −0.59% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −6.07% | −2.26% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −1.26% | −0.27% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 3.88% | 11.57% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 15.49% | 24.98% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 26.94% | 25.27% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | 125.66% | — | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLG vs MLT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GLG (Aktif Portföy Capital Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and MLT (Deniz Portföy Meltem Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GLG leads in 2 and MLT leads in 8. GLG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MLT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Today (est.): MLT leads (−1.49% vs −2.41%). Daily: MLT leads (−1.23% vs −1.87%). 1 week: MLT leads (−0.59% vs −2.76%). 1 month: MLT leads (−2.26% vs −6.07%). 3 months: MLT leads (−0.27% vs −1.26%). 6 months: MLT leads (11.57% vs 3.88%). YTD: MLT leads (24.98% vs 15.49%). 1 year: GLG leads (26.94% vs 25.27%). Size (TRY): MLT leads (19.8M vs 17.6M). Investors: GLG leads (246 vs 66).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GLG or MLT?
Year to date GLG returned 15.49% and MLT returned 24.98%; over the last year GLG returned 26.94% and MLT returned 25.27%. Over the last month GLG returned −6.07% and MLT returned −2.26%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GLG or MLT?
As of September 29, 2026, GLG has a size of TRY 17.6M with 246 investors, while MLT has a size of TRY 19.8M with 66 investors. MLT leads in size and GLG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GLG and MLT mean?
The CMB risk score of GLG is 6 out of 7 and that of MLT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.