ESP vs GLG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ESP (Aura Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and GLG (Aktif Portföy Capital Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yogun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ESP | GLG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −2.00% | −0.88% |
| Daily | −9.11% | −1.87% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −7.55% | −2.76% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −33.16% | −6.07% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −38.94% | −1.26% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | −30.64% | 3.88% | 11.90% |
| YTD | −68.40% | 15.49% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | −76.37% | 26.94% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | −76.11% | 125.66% | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ESP vs GLG Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ESP (Aura Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and GLG (Aktif Portföy Capital Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yogun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ESP leads in 1 and GLG leads in 10. ESP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aura Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GLG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GLG leads (−1.87% vs −9.11%). 1 week: GLG leads (−2.76% vs −7.55%). 1 month: GLG leads (−6.07% vs −33.16%). 3 months: GLG leads (−1.26% vs −38.94%). 6 months: GLG leads (3.88% vs −30.64%). YTD: GLG leads (15.49% vs −68.40%). 1 year: GLG leads (26.94% vs −76.37%). 3 years: GLG leads (125.66% vs −76.11%). Size (TRY): ESP leads (18.1M vs 17.6M). Investors: GLG leads (246 vs 241). Risk: GLG leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ESP or GLG?
Year to date ESP returned −68.40% and GLG returned 15.49%; over the last year ESP returned −76.37% and GLG returned 26.94%. Over the last month ESP returned −33.16% and GLG returned −6.07%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ESP or GLG?
As of September 29, 2026, ESP has a size of TRY 18.1M with 241 investors, while GLG has a size of TRY 17.6M with 246 investors. ESP leads in size and GLG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ESP and GLG mean?
The CMB risk score of ESP is 7 out of 7 and that of GLG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.