ECA vs SGT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ECA (Global MD Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ECA | SGT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −2.55% | — | −1.99% |
| Daily | −2.63% | 0.32% | −1.35% |
| 1 week | −6.04% | −0.20% | −2.09% |
| 1 month | −12.10% | −0.93% | −4.70% |
| 3 months | −5.83% | 10.79% | −1.44% |
| 6 months | 6.95% | 39.16% | 2.69% |
| YTD | 33.10% | 51.54% | 20.04% |
| 1 year | 48.89% | 50.17% | 28.83% |
| 3 years | 161.10% | — | 156.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ECA vs SGT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ECA (Global MD Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ECA leads in 0 and SGT leads in 10. ECA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SGT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: SGT leads (0.32% vs −2.63%). 1 week: SGT leads (−0.20% vs −6.04%). 1 month: SGT leads (−0.93% vs −12.10%). 3 months: SGT leads (10.79% vs −5.83%). 6 months: SGT leads (39.16% vs 6.95%). YTD: SGT leads (51.54% vs 33.10%). 1 year: SGT leads (50.17% vs 48.89%). Size (TRY): SGT leads (288.6M vs 253M). Investors: SGT leads (3,275 vs 699). Risk: SGT leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ECA or SGT?
Year to date ECA returned 33.10% and SGT returned 51.54%; over the last year ECA returned 48.89% and SGT returned 50.17%. Over the last month ECA returned −12.10% and SGT returned −0.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ECA or SGT?
As of October 23, 2026, ECA has a size of TRY 253M with 699 investors, while SGT has a size of TRY 288.6M with 3,275 investors. SGT leads in size and SGT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ECA and SGT mean?
The CMB risk score of ECA is 6 out of 7 and that of SGT is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.