ECA vs KET Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ECA (Global MD Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and KET (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ECA | KET | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −2.91% | — | −2.06% |
| Daily | −1.07% | −0.72% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −4.66% | −2.37% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −9.09% | −2.78% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | −2.38% | 2.47% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 9.84% | 9.06% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 36.69% | 35.51% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 52.06% | 45.17% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 168.16% | 200.07% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ECA vs KET Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ECA (Global MD Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and KET (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ECA leads in 4 and KET leads in 7. ECA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KET is a Variable Fund fund managed by Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KET leads (−0.72% vs −1.07%). 1 week: KET leads (−2.37% vs −4.66%). 1 month: KET leads (−2.78% vs −9.09%). 3 months: KET leads (2.47% vs −2.38%). 6 months: ECA leads (9.84% vs 9.06%). YTD: ECA leads (36.69% vs 35.51%). 1 year: ECA leads (52.06% vs 45.17%). 3 years: KET leads (200.07% vs 168.16%). Size (TRY): ECA leads (265.9M vs 258.1M). Investors: KET leads (2,758 vs 709). Risk: KET leads (4 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ECA or KET?
Year to date ECA returned 36.69% and KET returned 35.51%; over the last year ECA returned 52.06% and KET returned 45.17%. Over the last month ECA returned −9.09% and KET returned −2.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ECA or KET?
As of October 22, 2026, ECA has a size of TRY 265.9M with 709 investors, while KET has a size of TRY 258.1M with 2,758 investors. ECA leads in size and KET leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ECA and KET mean?
The CMB risk score of ECA is 6 out of 7 and that of KET is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.