CHG vs ECA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHG (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ECA (Global MD Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CHG | ECA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −3.59% | −2.65% |
| Daily | −3.00% | −2.63% | −1.35% |
| 1 week | −5.20% | −6.04% | −2.09% |
| 1 month | −9.25% | −12.10% | −4.70% |
| 3 months | −5.39% | −5.83% | −1.44% |
| 6 months | −10.80% | 6.95% | 2.69% |
| YTD | 8.21% | 33.10% | 20.04% |
| 1 year | 17.46% | 48.89% | 28.83% |
| 3 years | 115.14% | 161.10% | 156.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CHG vs ECA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CHG (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ECA (Global MD Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CHG leads in 3 and ECA leads in 7. CHG is a Variable Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; ECA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ECA leads (−2.63% vs −3.00%). 1 week: CHG leads (−5.20% vs −6.04%). 1 month: CHG leads (−9.25% vs −12.10%). 3 months: CHG leads (−5.39% vs −5.83%). 6 months: ECA leads (6.95% vs −10.80%). YTD: ECA leads (33.10% vs 8.21%). 1 year: ECA leads (48.89% vs 17.46%). 3 years: ECA leads (161.10% vs 115.14%). Size (TRY): ECA leads (253M vs 250.8M). Investors: ECA leads (699 vs 337).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CHG or ECA?
Year to date CHG returned 8.21% and ECA returned 33.10%; over the last year CHG returned 17.46% and ECA returned 48.89%. Over the last month CHG returned −9.25% and ECA returned −12.10%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CHG or ECA?
As of October 23, 2026, CHG has a size of TRY 250.8M with 337 investors, while ECA has a size of TRY 253M with 699 investors. ECA leads in size and ECA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CHG and ECA mean?
The CMB risk score of CHG is 6 out of 7 and that of ECA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.