AJR vs ECA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AJR (Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ECA (Global Md Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | AJR | ECA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −2.36% | −1.84% |
| Daily | 0.31% | 0.66% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.42% | 1.21% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −5.52% | −0.16% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | −4.15% | 9.73% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 5.44% | 31.49% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 15.10% | 51.56% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | 21.39% | 67.43% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | 137.74% | 187.23% | 161.05% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the AJR vs ECA comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AJR (Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ECA (Global Md Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AJR leads in 0 and ECA leads in 10. AJR is a Variable Fund fund managed by Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; ECA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Global Md Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ECA leads (0.66% vs 0.31%). 1 week: ECA leads (1.21% vs −0.42%). 1 month: ECA leads (−0.16% vs −5.52%). 3 months: ECA leads (9.73% vs −4.15%). 6 months: ECA leads (31.49% vs 5.44%). YTD: ECA leads (51.56% vs 15.10%). 1 year: ECA leads (67.43% vs 21.39%). 3 years: ECA leads (187.23% vs 137.74%). Size (TRY): ECA leads (300.2M vs 290.9M). Investors: ECA leads (824 vs 582).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, AJR or ECA?
Year to date AJR returned 15.10% and ECA returned 51.56%; over the last year AJR returned 21.39% and ECA returned 67.43%. Over the last month AJR returned −5.52% and ECA returned −0.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AJR or ECA?
As of September 28, 2026, AJR has a size of TRY 290.9M with 582 investors, while ECA has a size of TRY 300.2M with 824 investors. ECA leads in size and ECA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AJR and ECA mean?
The CMB risk score of AJR is 6 out of 7 and that of ECA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.