Yatırımcı.AI

GZH vs SGT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZH (Garanti Portföy Temiz Enerji Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

GZHSGT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GZH vs SGT Fund Comparison
MetricGZHSGTCategory median
Daily0.48%1.48%−0.41%
1 week−2.78%−3.40%−1.69%
1 month−4.64%0.23%−3.34%
3 months−7.36%9.82%0.00%
6 months−9.26%38.72%4.10%
YTD14.30%51.07%21.58%
1 year22.38%50.36%30.90%
3 years95.95%—160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GZH vs SGT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZH (Garanti Portföy Temiz Enerji Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GZH leads in 3 and SGT leads in 6. GZH is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SGT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: SGT leads (1.48% vs 0.48%). 1 week: GZH leads (−2.78% vs −3.40%). 1 month: SGT leads (0.23% vs −4.64%). 3 months: SGT leads (9.82% vs −7.36%). 6 months: SGT leads (38.72% vs −9.26%). YTD: SGT leads (51.07% vs 14.30%). 1 year: SGT leads (50.36% vs 22.38%). Size (TRY): GZH leads (293.5M vs 288.1M). Investors: GZH leads (4,842 vs 3,337).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GZH returned 14.30% and SGT returned 51.07%; over the last year GZH returned 22.38% and SGT returned 50.36%. Over the last month GZH returned −4.64% and SGT returned 0.23%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GZH has a size of TRY 293.5M with 4,842 investors, while SGT has a size of TRY 288.1M with 3,337 investors. GZH leads in size and GZH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZH is 5 out of 7 and that of SGT is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.