ECA vs GZH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ECA (Global MD Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and GZH (Garanti Portföy Temiz Enerji Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ECA | GZH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −0.69% | — | −0.86% |
| Daily | −2.63% | −2.02% | −1.35% |
| 1 week | −6.04% | −2.01% | −2.09% |
| 1 month | −12.10% | −8.07% | −4.70% |
| 3 months | −5.83% | −10.11% | −1.44% |
| 6 months | 6.95% | −11.10% | 2.69% |
| YTD | 33.10% | 11.99% | 20.04% |
| 1 year | 48.89% | 20.56% | 28.83% |
| 3 years | 161.10% | 91.98% | 156.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ECA vs GZH Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ECA (Global MD Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and GZH (Garanti Portföy Temiz Enerji Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ECA leads in 5 and GZH leads in 6. ECA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZH is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GZH leads (−2.02% vs −2.63%). 1 week: GZH leads (−2.01% vs −6.04%). 1 month: GZH leads (−8.07% vs −12.10%). 3 months: ECA leads (−5.83% vs −10.11%). 6 months: ECA leads (6.95% vs −11.10%). YTD: ECA leads (33.10% vs 11.99%). 1 year: ECA leads (48.89% vs 20.56%). 3 years: ECA leads (161.10% vs 91.98%). Size (TRY): GZH leads (286.4M vs 253M). Investors: GZH leads (4,820 vs 699). Risk: GZH leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ECA or GZH?
Year to date ECA returned 33.10% and GZH returned 11.99%; over the last year ECA returned 48.89% and GZH returned 20.56%. Over the last month ECA returned −12.10% and GZH returned −8.07%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ECA or GZH?
As of October 23, 2026, ECA has a size of TRY 253M with 699 investors, while GZH has a size of TRY 286.4M with 4,820 investors. GZH leads in size and GZH leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ECA and GZH mean?
The CMB risk score of ECA is 6 out of 7 and that of GZH is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.