CKS vs NLK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CKS | NLK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.56% | 0.52% | 0.51% |
| 1 month | 2.66% | 2.94% | 1.66% |
| 3 months | 5.34% | 9.66% | 3.04% |
| 6 months | 11.51% | 21.42% | 8.17% |
| YTD | 19.56% | 40.37% | 17.49% |
| 1 year | 22.95% | 48.15% | 21.23% |
| 3 years | 113.34% | — | 105.57% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CKS vs NLK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, CKS leads in 3 and NLK leads in 6. CKS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NLK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NLK leads (0.10% vs 0.04%). 1 week: CKS leads (0.56% vs 0.52%). 1 month: NLK leads (2.94% vs 2.66%). 3 months: NLK leads (9.66% vs 5.34%). 6 months: NLK leads (21.42% vs 11.51%). YTD: NLK leads (40.37% vs 19.56%). 1 year: NLK leads (48.15% vs 22.95%). Size (TRY): CKS leads (5B vs 5B). Investors: CKS leads (2,081 vs 756).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CKS or NLK?
Year to date CKS returned 19.56% and NLK returned 40.37%; over the last year CKS returned 22.95% and NLK returned 48.15%. Over the last month CKS returned 2.66% and NLK returned 2.94%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CKS or NLK?
As of November 13, 2026, CKS has a size of TRY 5B with 2,081 investors, while NLK has a size of TRY 5B with 756 investors. CKS leads in size and CKS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CKS and NLK mean?
The CMB risk score of CKS is — out of 7 and that of NLK is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.