Yatırımcı.AI

CKS vs EBS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and EBS (Emaa Blue Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz-Abd Doları) Fon) side by side.

CKSEBS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CKS vs EBS Fund Comparison
MetricCKSEBSCategory median
Daily0.28%0.35%0.16%
1 week0.63%0.67%0.46%
1 month2.61%2.82%1.10%
3 months5.35%5.98%3.53%
6 months11.15%12.57%8.53%
YTD18.32%18.91%16.18%
1 year22.60%23.27%19.94%
3 years113.74%—103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CKS vs EBS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CKS (İş Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and EBS (Emaa Blue Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz-Abd Doları) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, CKS leads in 2 and EBS leads in 7. CKS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; EBS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EBS leads (0.35% vs 0.28%). 1 week: EBS leads (0.67% vs 0.63%). 1 month: EBS leads (2.82% vs 2.61%). 3 months: EBS leads (5.98% vs 5.35%). 6 months: EBS leads (12.57% vs 11.15%). YTD: EBS leads (18.91% vs 18.32%). 1 year: EBS leads (23.27% vs 22.60%). Size (TRY): CKS leads (5.1B vs 5B). Investors: CKS leads (2,116 vs 23).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CKS returned 18.32% and EBS returned 18.91%; over the last year CKS returned 22.60% and EBS returned 23.27%. Over the last month CKS returned 2.61% and EBS returned 2.82%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, CKS has a size of TRY 5.1B with 2,116 investors, while EBS has a size of TRY 5B with 23 investors. CKS leads in size and CKS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CKS is — out of 7 and that of EBS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.