Yatırımcı.AI

BKY vs NVT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BKY (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

BKYNVT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BKY vs NVT Fund Comparison
MetricBKYNVTCategory median
Daily0.06%0.10%0.05%
1 week0.51%0.65%0.44%
1 month2.04%2.80%0.38%
3 months6.35%9.18%3.95%
6 months13.20%19.96%8.45%
YTD20.12%33.50%16.06%
1 year23.85%43.29%20.98%
3 years—252.76%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BKY vs NVT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BKY (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BKY leads in 2 and NVT leads in 7. BKY is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NVT leads (0.10% vs 0.06%). 1 week: NVT leads (0.65% vs 0.51%). 1 month: NVT leads (2.80% vs 2.04%). 3 months: NVT leads (9.18% vs 6.35%). 6 months: NVT leads (19.96% vs 13.20%). YTD: NVT leads (33.50% vs 20.12%). 1 year: NVT leads (43.29% vs 23.85%). Size (TRY): BKY leads (11.5B vs 8.5B). Investors: BKY leads (1,192 vs 96).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BKY returned 20.12% and NVT returned 33.50%; over the last year BKY returned 23.85% and NVT returned 43.29%. Over the last month BKY returned 2.04% and NVT returned 2.80%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, BKY has a size of TRY 11.5B with 1,192 investors, while NVT has a size of TRY 8.5B with 96 investors. BKY leads in size and BKY leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BKY is — out of 7 and that of NVT is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.