Yatırımcı.AI

BKY vs KVS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BKY (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and KVS (Azimut Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

BKYKVS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BKY vs KVS Fund Comparison
MetricBKYKVSCategory median
Daily0.06%0.10%0.05%
1 week0.51%0.71%0.44%
1 month2.04%3.02%0.38%
3 months6.35%10.22%3.95%
6 months13.20%22.07%8.45%
YTD20.12%37.50%16.06%
1 year23.85%48.37%20.98%
3 years—253.15%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BKY vs KVS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BKY (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and KVS (Azimut Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BKY leads in 1 and KVS leads in 8. BKY is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KVS leads (0.10% vs 0.06%). 1 week: KVS leads (0.71% vs 0.51%). 1 month: KVS leads (3.02% vs 2.04%). 3 months: KVS leads (10.22% vs 6.35%). 6 months: KVS leads (22.07% vs 13.20%). YTD: KVS leads (37.50% vs 20.12%). 1 year: KVS leads (48.37% vs 23.85%). Size (TRY): KVS leads (12.5B vs 11.5B). Investors: BKY leads (1,192 vs 1,123).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BKY returned 20.12% and KVS returned 37.50%; over the last year BKY returned 23.85% and KVS returned 48.37%. Over the last month BKY returned 2.04% and KVS returned 3.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, BKY has a size of TRY 11.5B with 1,192 investors, while KVS has a size of TRY 12.5B with 1,123 investors. KVS leads in size and BKY leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BKY is — out of 7 and that of KVS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.