BDA vs FLS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BDA (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BDA | FLS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.06% | −0.21% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.59% | 0.26% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −0.21% | −0.87% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 4.14% | 3.80% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 7.07% | 7.25% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 12.68% | 13.32% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 17.47% | 20.16% | 20.69% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BDA vs FLS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BDA (Yapı Kredi Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BDA leads in 5 and FLS leads in 4. BDA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FLS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BDA leads (0.06% vs −0.21%). 1 week: BDA leads (0.59% vs 0.26%). 1 month: BDA leads (−0.21% vs −0.87%). 3 months: BDA leads (4.14% vs 3.80%). 6 months: FLS leads (7.25% vs 7.07%). YTD: FLS leads (13.32% vs 12.68%). 1 year: FLS leads (20.16% vs 17.47%). Size (TRY): BDA leads (4.3B vs 3.8B). Investors: FLS leads (2,027 vs 768).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BDA or FLS?
Year to date BDA returned 12.68% and FLS returned 13.32%; over the last year BDA returned 17.47% and FLS returned 20.16%. Over the last month BDA returned −0.21% and FLS returned −0.87%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BDA or FLS?
As of October 23, 2026, BDA has a size of TRY 4.3B with 768 investors, while FLS has a size of TRY 3.8B with 2,027 investors. BDA leads in size and FLS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BDA and FLS mean?
The CMB risk score of BDA is — out of 7 and that of FLS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.