FLS vs VNK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and VNK (Vega Portföy Anka Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FLS | VNK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.74% | 0.59% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | −0.36% | 3.27% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 3.92% | 8.14% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 7.48% | 8.65% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 13.57% | 22.73% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 20.23% | 34.54% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | — | 46.54% | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FLS vs VNK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and VNK (Vega Portföy Anka Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FLS leads in 4 and VNK leads in 5. FLS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VNK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Vega Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FLS leads (0.29% vs 0.22%). 1 week: FLS leads (0.74% vs 0.59%). 1 month: VNK leads (3.27% vs −0.36%). 3 months: VNK leads (8.14% vs 3.92%). 6 months: VNK leads (8.65% vs 7.48%). YTD: VNK leads (22.73% vs 13.57%). 1 year: VNK leads (34.54% vs 20.23%). Size (TRY): FLS leads (3.8B vs 3.7B). Investors: FLS leads (2,028 vs 164).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FLS or VNK?
Year to date FLS returned 13.57% and VNK returned 22.73%; over the last year FLS returned 20.23% and VNK returned 34.54%. Over the last month FLS returned −0.36% and VNK returned 3.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FLS or VNK?
As of October 22, 2026, FLS has a size of TRY 3.8B with 2,028 investors, while VNK has a size of TRY 3.7B with 164 investors. FLS leads in size and FLS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FLS and VNK mean?
The CMB risk score of FLS is — out of 7 and that of VNK is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.