FLS vs NCS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and NCS (Nurol Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FLS | NCS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.29% | 0.07% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.74% | 0.55% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | −0.36% | 2.22% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 3.92% | 6.58% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 7.48% | 13.34% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 13.57% | 20.27% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 20.23% | 24.24% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | — | 114.01% | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FLS vs NCS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FLS (Yapı Kredi Portföy Florya Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and NCS (Nurol Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FLS leads in 4 and NCS leads in 5. FLS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NCS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FLS leads (0.29% vs 0.07%). 1 week: FLS leads (0.74% vs 0.55%). 1 month: NCS leads (2.22% vs −0.36%). 3 months: NCS leads (6.58% vs 3.92%). 6 months: NCS leads (13.34% vs 7.48%). YTD: NCS leads (20.27% vs 13.57%). 1 year: NCS leads (24.24% vs 20.23%). Size (TRY): FLS leads (3.8B vs 3.5B). Investors: FLS leads (2,028 vs 1,053).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FLS or NCS?
Year to date FLS returned 13.57% and NCS returned 20.27%; over the last year FLS returned 20.23% and NCS returned 24.24%. Over the last month FLS returned −0.36% and NCS returned 2.22%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FLS or NCS?
As of October 22, 2026, FLS has a size of TRY 3.8B with 2,028 investors, while NCS has a size of TRY 3.5B with 1,053 investors. FLS leads in size and FLS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FLS and NCS mean?
The CMB risk score of FLS is — out of 7 and that of NCS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.