BCO vs RKS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BCO (Bulls Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) side by side.
BCO cannot currently be bought or sold on TEFAS. Its returns in this comparison are based on the last price published on TEFAS (October 23, 2026). BCO fund page
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BCO | RKS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.75% | 0.09% | −0.60% |
| 1 week | −4.38% | 0.67% | −0.86% |
| 1 month | −8.19% | 2.91% | −0.33% |
| 3 months | 0.24% | 4.91% | 4.42% |
| 6 months | 5.80% | 14.95% | 12.01% |
| YTD | 31.21% | 27.98% | 28.30% |
| 1 year | 39.91% | 37.27% | 34.68% |
| 3 years | — | 18.82% | 158.22% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BCO vs RKS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BCO (Bulls Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and RKS (Rota Portföy Kira Sertifikaları Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BCO leads in 3 and RKS leads in 7. BCO is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Bulls Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RKS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RKS leads (0.09% vs −1.75%). 1 week: RKS leads (0.67% vs −4.38%). 1 month: RKS leads (2.91% vs −8.19%). 3 months: RKS leads (4.91% vs 0.24%). 6 months: RKS leads (14.95% vs 5.80%). YTD: BCO leads (31.21% vs 27.98%). 1 year: BCO leads (39.91% vs 37.27%). Size (TRY): RKS leads (93.6M vs 88.2M). Investors: BCO leads (1,211 vs 126). Risk: RKS leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BCO or RKS?
Year to date BCO returned 31.21% and RKS returned 27.98%; over the last year BCO returned 39.91% and RKS returned 37.27%. Over the last month BCO returned −8.19% and RKS returned 2.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BCO or RKS?
As of October 23, 2026, BCO has a size of TRY 88.2M with 1,211 investors, while RKS has a size of TRY 93.6M with 126 investors. RKS leads in size and BCO leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BCO and RKS mean?
The CMB risk score of BCO is 6 out of 7 and that of RKS is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.