RBL vs SKZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RBL (QNB Portföy Robotik ve Blockchain Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) and SKZ (Neo Portföy Sekizinci Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | RBL | SKZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.42% | −0.53% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | −0.94% | −0.84% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | 1.29% | −1.53% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 7.58% | 5.84% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 42.44% | −3.20% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 35.85% | 42.60% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 36.95% | — | 21.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the RBL vs SKZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of RBL (QNB Portföy Robotik ve Blockchain Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) and SKZ (Neo Portföy Sekizinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, RBL leads in 6 and SKZ leads in 3. RBL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SKZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: SKZ leads (−0.53% vs −1.42%). 1 week: SKZ leads (−0.84% vs −0.94%). 1 month: RBL leads (1.29% vs −1.53%). 3 months: RBL leads (7.58% vs 5.84%). 6 months: RBL leads (42.44% vs −3.20%). YTD: SKZ leads (42.60% vs 35.85%). Size (TRY): RBL leads (225.9M vs 217.2M). Investors: RBL leads (745 vs 464). Risk: RBL leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, RBL or SKZ?
Year to date RBL returned 35.85% and SKZ returned 42.60%; over the last year RBL returned 36.95% and SKZ returned —. Over the last month RBL returned 1.29% and SKZ returned −1.53%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, RBL or SKZ?
As of September 29, 2026, RBL has a size of TRY 225.9M with 745 investors, while SKZ has a size of TRY 217.2M with 464 investors. RBL leads in size and RBL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of RBL and SKZ mean?
The CMB risk score of RBL is 6 out of 7 and that of SKZ is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.