Yatırımcı.AI

PHF vs SKZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PHF (Piramit Portföy BİST 50 Dışı Şirketler Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and SKZ (Neo Portföy Sekizinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

PHFSKZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

PHF vs SKZ Fund Comparison
MetricPHFSKZCategory median
Today (est.)2.68%—−1.90%
Daily6.38%0.21%0.19%
1 week2.11%−0.55%0.42%
1 month16.01%−1.01%0.94%
3 months71.81%6.40%5.89%
6 months39.88%−3.23%12.86%
YTD46.81%44.22%18.07%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 11:19.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the PHF vs SKZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PHF (Piramit Portföy BİST 50 Dışı Şirketler Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and SKZ (Neo Portföy Sekizinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, PHF leads in 6 and SKZ leads in 2. PHF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Piramit Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SKZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PHF leads (6.38% vs 0.21%). 1 week: PHF leads (2.11% vs −0.55%). 1 month: PHF leads (16.01% vs −1.01%). 3 months: PHF leads (71.81% vs 6.40%). 6 months: PHF leads (39.88% vs −3.23%). YTD: PHF leads (46.81% vs 44.22%). Size (TRY): SKZ leads (218.4M vs 212.1M). Investors: SKZ leads (469 vs 230).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date PHF returned 46.81% and SKZ returned 44.22%; over the last year PHF returned — and SKZ returned —. Over the last month PHF returned 16.01% and SKZ returned −1.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, PHF has a size of TRY 212.1M with 230 investors, while SKZ has a size of TRY 218.4M with 469 investors. SKZ leads in size and SKZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PHF is 7 out of 7 and that of SKZ is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.