Yatırımcı.AI

FS6 vs SKZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FS6 (One Portföy İkinci İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and SKZ (Neo Portföy Sekizinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

FS6SKZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FS6 vs SKZ Fund Comparison
MetricFS6SKZCategory median
Daily0.08%0.21%0.19%
1 week0.20%−0.55%0.42%
1 month2.44%−1.01%0.94%
3 months17.69%6.40%5.89%
6 months22.17%−3.23%12.86%
YTD39.30%44.22%18.07%
1 year59.02%—24.44%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FS6 vs SKZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FS6 (One Portföy İkinci İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and SKZ (Neo Portföy Sekizinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FS6 leads in 6 and SKZ leads in 3. FS6 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SKZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: SKZ leads (0.21% vs 0.08%). 1 week: FS6 leads (0.20% vs −0.55%). 1 month: FS6 leads (2.44% vs −1.01%). 3 months: FS6 leads (17.69% vs 6.40%). 6 months: FS6 leads (22.17% vs −3.23%). YTD: SKZ leads (44.22% vs 39.30%). Size (TRY): FS6 leads (220M vs 218.4M). Investors: SKZ leads (469 vs 252). Risk: FS6 leads (4 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FS6 returned 39.30% and SKZ returned 44.22%; over the last year FS6 returned 59.02% and SKZ returned —. Over the last month FS6 returned 2.44% and SKZ returned −1.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FS6 has a size of TRY 220M with 252 investors, while SKZ has a size of TRY 218.4M with 469 investors. FS6 leads in size and SKZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FS6 is 4 out of 7 and that of SKZ is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.