PUC vs VMV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and VMV (Vega Portföy Mavi Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PUC | VMV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.07% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.69% | 0.69% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 2.97% | 2.90% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 9.89% | 9.81% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 21.53% | 20.90% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 36.51% | 36.22% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 46.79% | 46.79% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | 259.83% | 62.29% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PUC vs VMV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and VMV (Vega Portföy Mavi Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PUC leads in 9 and VMV leads in 1. PUC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VMV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Vega Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PUC leads (0.10% vs 0.07%). 1 week: VMV leads (0.69% vs 0.69%). 1 month: PUC leads (2.97% vs 2.90%). 3 months: PUC leads (9.89% vs 9.81%). 6 months: PUC leads (21.53% vs 20.90%). YTD: PUC leads (36.51% vs 36.22%). 1 year: PUC leads (46.79% vs 46.79%). 3 years: PUC leads (259.83% vs 62.29%). Size (TRY): PUC leads (8.7B vs 7.7B). Investors: PUC leads (866 vs 98).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, PUC or VMV?
Year to date PUC returned 36.51% and VMV returned 36.22%; over the last year PUC returned 46.79% and VMV returned 46.79%. Over the last month PUC returned 2.97% and VMV returned 2.90%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PUC or VMV?
As of October 23, 2026, PUC has a size of TRY 8.7B with 866 investors, while VMV has a size of TRY 7.7B with 98 investors. PUC leads in size and PUC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PUC and VMV mean?
The CMB risk score of PUC is 2 out of 7 and that of VMV is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.