PTF vs RPN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PTF (QNB Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PTF | RPN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | 0.01% | −0.73% |
| Daily | 0.02% | −1.75% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.38% | −3.02% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | 2.13% | −6.11% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 8.47% | −10.28% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 17.09% | 0.53% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 26.89% | 7.75% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 41.13% | 14.65% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | — | 30.76% | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PTF vs RPN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PTF (QNB Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PTF leads in 10 and RPN leads in 0. PTF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PTF leads (0.02% vs −1.75%). 1 week: PTF leads (0.38% vs −3.02%). 1 month: PTF leads (2.13% vs −6.11%). 3 months: PTF leads (8.47% vs −10.28%). 6 months: PTF leads (17.09% vs 0.53%). YTD: PTF leads (26.89% vs 7.75%). 1 year: PTF leads (41.13% vs 14.65%). Size (TRY): PTF leads (777.3M vs 766M). Investors: PTF leads (257 vs 23). Risk: PTF leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, PTF or RPN?
Year to date PTF returned 26.89% and RPN returned 7.75%; over the last year PTF returned 41.13% and RPN returned 14.65%. Over the last month PTF returned 2.13% and RPN returned −6.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PTF or RPN?
As of September 29, 2026, PTF has a size of TRY 777.3M with 257 investors, while RPN has a size of TRY 766M with 23 investors. PTF leads in size and PTF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PTF and RPN mean?
The CMB risk score of PTF is 2 out of 7 and that of RPN is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.