HAR vs RPN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HAR (BV Portföy Harmony Serbest Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | HAR | RPN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | 0.01% | −0.73% |
| Daily | −0.02% | −1.75% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.47% | −3.02% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | −1.56% | −6.11% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 7.12% | −10.28% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 19.09% | 0.53% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 22.14% | 7.75% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | — | 14.65% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | — | 30.76% | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the HAR vs RPN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of HAR (BV Portföy Harmony Serbest Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, HAR leads in 7 and RPN leads in 2. HAR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: HAR leads (−0.02% vs −1.75%). 1 week: HAR leads (0.47% vs −3.02%). 1 month: HAR leads (−1.56% vs −6.11%). 3 months: HAR leads (7.12% vs −10.28%). 6 months: HAR leads (19.09% vs 0.53%). YTD: HAR leads (22.14% vs 7.75%). Size (TRY): RPN leads (766M vs 758.4M). Investors: HAR leads (66 vs 23). Risk: RPN leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, HAR or RPN?
Year to date HAR returned 22.14% and RPN returned 7.75%; over the last year HAR returned — and RPN returned 14.65%. Over the last month HAR returned −1.56% and RPN returned −6.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, HAR or RPN?
As of September 29, 2026, HAR has a size of TRY 758.4M with 66 investors, while RPN has a size of TRY 766M with 23 investors. RPN leads in size and HAR leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of HAR and RPN mean?
The CMB risk score of HAR is 7 out of 7 and that of RPN is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.