BJD vs PTF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PTF (QNB Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BJD | PTF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.24% | 0.02% | −0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.38% | 0.38% | −0.29% |
| 1 month | 1.98% | 2.13% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 5.98% | 8.47% | 4.33% |
| 6 months | 11.85% | 17.09% | 11.90% |
| YTD | 16.30% | 26.89% | 14.97% |
| 1 year | 21.35% | 41.13% | 21.27% |
| 3 years | 92.10% | — | 111.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BJD vs PTF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BJD (Azimut Portföy 13.0 Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PTF (QNB Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BJD leads in 2 and PTF leads in 7. BJD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PTF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BJD leads (0.24% vs 0.02%). 1 week: BJD leads (0.38% vs 0.38%). 1 month: PTF leads (2.13% vs 1.98%). 3 months: PTF leads (8.47% vs 5.98%). 6 months: PTF leads (17.09% vs 11.85%). YTD: PTF leads (26.89% vs 16.30%). 1 year: PTF leads (41.13% vs 21.35%). Size (TRY): PTF leads (777.3M vs 769.1M). Investors: PTF leads (257 vs 99).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BJD or PTF?
Year to date BJD returned 16.30% and PTF returned 26.89%; over the last year BJD returned 21.35% and PTF returned 41.13%. Over the last month BJD returned 1.98% and PTF returned 2.13%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BJD or PTF?
As of September 29, 2026, BJD has a size of TRY 769.1M with 99 investors, while PTF has a size of TRY 777.3M with 257 investors. PTF leads in size and PTF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BJD and PTF mean?
The CMB risk score of BJD is — out of 7 and that of PTF is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.