Yatırımcı.AI

PRD vs SPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PRD (Piramit Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and SPP (Sparta Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

PRDSPP
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

PRD vs SPP Fund Comparison
MetricPRDSPPCategory median
Daily0.30%0.32%0.29%
1 week0.73%0.76%0.70%
1 month3.29%3.18%3.12%
3 months10.60%10.30%9.98%
6 months22.93%23.06%21.60%
YTD33.11%33.67%32.28%
1 year48.45%48.49%46.56%
3 years33.14%—257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the PRD vs SPP comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PRD (Piramit Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and SPP (Sparta Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PRD leads in 3 and SPP leads in 7. PRD is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Piramit Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Sparta Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: SPP leads (0.32% vs 0.30%). 1 week: SPP leads (0.76% vs 0.73%). 1 month: PRD leads (3.29% vs 3.18%). 3 months: PRD leads (10.60% vs 10.30%). 6 months: SPP leads (23.06% vs 22.93%). YTD: SPP leads (33.67% vs 33.11%). 1 year: SPP leads (48.49% vs 48.45%). Size (TRY): PRD leads (301.7M vs 250M). Investors: SPP leads (616 vs 452). Risk: SPP leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date PRD returned 33.11% and SPP returned 33.67%; over the last year PRD returned 48.45% and SPP returned 48.49%. Over the last month PRD returned 3.29% and SPP returned 3.18%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, PRD has a size of TRY 301.7M with 452 investors, while SPP has a size of TRY 250M with 616 investors. PRD leads in size and SPP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PRD is 2 out of 7 and that of SPP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.