KPP vs SPP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KPP (Kare Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) and SPP (Sparta Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KPP | SPP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.30% | 0.32% | 0.29% |
| 1 week | 0.70% | 0.76% | 0.70% |
| 1 month | 3.04% | 3.18% | 3.12% |
| 3 months | 9.91% | 10.30% | 9.98% |
| 6 months | 21.63% | 23.06% | 21.60% |
| YTD | 32.73% | 33.67% | 32.28% |
| 1 year | 47.04% | 48.49% | 46.56% |
| 3 years | 81.88% | — | 257.27% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KPP vs SPP comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KPP (Kare Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) and SPP (Sparta Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KPP leads in 1 and SPP leads in 8. KPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Sparta Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: SPP leads (0.32% vs 0.30%). 1 week: SPP leads (0.76% vs 0.70%). 1 month: SPP leads (3.18% vs 3.04%). 3 months: SPP leads (10.30% vs 9.91%). 6 months: SPP leads (23.06% vs 21.63%). YTD: SPP leads (33.67% vs 32.73%). 1 year: SPP leads (48.49% vs 47.04%). Size (TRY): KPP leads (364.2M vs 250M). Investors: SPP leads (616 vs 548).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, KPP or SPP?
Year to date KPP returned 32.73% and SPP returned 33.67%; over the last year KPP returned 47.04% and SPP returned 48.49%. Over the last month KPP returned 3.04% and SPP returned 3.18%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KPP or SPP?
As of September 28, 2026, KPP has a size of TRY 364.2M with 548 investors, while SPP has a size of TRY 250M with 616 investors. KPP leads in size and SPP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KPP and SPP mean?
The CMB risk score of KPP is 1 out of 7 and that of SPP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.