PKT vs UNT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PKT | UNT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.06% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 0.66% | 0.56% |
| 1 month | 3.06% | 3.01% | 1.84% |
| 3 months | 9.66% | 9.44% | 3.29% |
| 6 months | 21.13% | 20.65% | 7.90% |
| YTD | 38.66% | 38.14% | 17.53% |
| 1 year | 45.85% | 45.37% | 21.48% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PKT vs UNT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and UNT (İş Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, PKT leads in 9 and UNT leads in 0. PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UNT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PKT leads (0.10% vs 0.09%). 1 week: PKT leads (0.67% vs 0.66%). 1 month: PKT leads (3.06% vs 3.01%). 3 months: PKT leads (9.66% vs 9.44%). 6 months: PKT leads (21.13% vs 20.65%). YTD: PKT leads (38.66% vs 38.14%). 1 year: PKT leads (45.85% vs 45.37%). Size (TRY): PKT leads (7.2B vs 6.8B). Investors: PKT leads (1,427 vs 278).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, PKT or UNT?
Year to date PKT returned 38.66% and UNT returned 38.14%; over the last year PKT returned 45.85% and UNT returned 45.37%. Over the last month PKT returned 3.06% and UNT returned 3.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PKT or UNT?
As of November 12, 2026, PKT has a size of TRY 7.2B with 1,427 investors, while UNT has a size of TRY 6.8B with 278 investors. PKT leads in size and PKT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PKT and UNT mean?
The CMB risk score of PKT is 2 out of 7 and that of UNT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.