Yatırımcı.AI

NVT vs PKT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

NVTPKT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NVT vs PKT Fund Comparison
MetricNVTPKTCategory median
Daily0.09%0.10%0.06%
1 week0.65%0.67%0.56%
1 month2.88%3.06%1.84%
3 months9.07%9.66%3.29%
6 months19.94%21.13%7.90%
YTD36.07%38.66%17.53%
1 year42.82%45.85%21.48%
3 years251.78%—105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NVT vs PKT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NVT (Neo Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NVT leads in 1 and PKT leads in 9. NVT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PKT leads (0.10% vs 0.09%). 1 week: PKT leads (0.67% vs 0.65%). 1 month: PKT leads (3.06% vs 2.88%). 3 months: PKT leads (9.66% vs 9.07%). 6 months: PKT leads (21.13% vs 19.94%). YTD: PKT leads (38.66% vs 36.07%). 1 year: PKT leads (45.85% vs 42.82%). Size (TRY): NVT leads (7.4B vs 7.2B). Investors: PKT leads (1,427 vs 88). Risk: PKT leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NVT returned 36.07% and PKT returned 38.66%; over the last year NVT returned 42.82% and PKT returned 45.85%. Over the last month NVT returned 2.88% and PKT returned 3.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, NVT has a size of TRY 7.4B with 88 investors, while PKT has a size of TRY 7.2B with 1,427 investors. NVT leads in size and PKT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NVT is 3 out of 7 and that of PKT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.