KNI vs PUC Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KNI (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KNI | PUC | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.27% | 0.29% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 2.98% | 3.15% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 9.43% | 10.08% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 20.38% | 21.97% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 30.52% | 32.95% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | — | 47.13% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 258.54% | 111.64% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KNI vs PUC Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KNI (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, KNI leads in 1 and PUC leads in 7. KNI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PUC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PUC leads (0.29% vs 0.27%). 1 week: PUC leads (0.68% vs 0.65%). 1 month: PUC leads (3.15% vs 2.98%). 3 months: PUC leads (10.08% vs 9.43%). 6 months: PUC leads (21.97% vs 20.38%). YTD: PUC leads (32.95% vs 30.52%). Size (TRY): KNI leads (6.6B vs 6.4B). Investors: PUC leads (800 vs 403).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, KNI or PUC?
Year to date KNI returned 30.52% and PUC returned 32.95%; over the last year KNI returned — and PUC returned 47.13%. Over the last month KNI returned 2.98% and PUC returned 3.15%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KNI or PUC?
As of September 28, 2026, KNI has a size of TRY 6.6B with 403 investors, while PUC has a size of TRY 6.4B with 800 investors. KNI leads in size and PUC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KNI and PUC mean?
The CMB risk score of KNI is 2 out of 7 and that of PUC is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.